Some of our information has moved to NT.GOV.AU
Cool season production of tropical grasses
Figure 3: Grass trial at CPRS, November 2016
Arthur Cameron, Principal Pastures Agronomist, Darwin
There is interest in growing fodder under irrigation during the Top End dry season to supply live cattle export yards and cubing/pelleting plants with hay. Tropical grasses generally do not grow well under irrigation during the cooler months of the year in the Top End of the Northern Territory (NT). Sugargraze Forage sorghum (Sorghum sp) and Finecut Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) have been shown to produce commercial yields of 25 to 35 tonnes per hectare per year at Douglas Daly Research Farm (DDRF). Both of these options for fodder production under irrigation have limitations. The Forage sorghum generally needs to be resown every year to maintain a productive stand. In the Top End, the Finecut Rhodes grass is not liked by cattle as a fodder, and it has a high tensile strength, which makes it difficult to grind and make into fodder cubes and pellets.
There are a number of other tropical grasses which have cold tolerance, and may be suitable as alternatives to Forage sorghum and Finecut Rhodes. The cool season growth of seven other tropical grasses was compared with that of Finecut Rhodes at Coastal Plains Research Station to select one or more cultivars which have equivalent or better cool season growth and/or better acceptance by cattle and better grinding characteristics.
Seven of the grasses were sown by seed in December 2014. The eighth grass, Strickland Finger grass, was planted by runners in February 2015. The grasses planted and the first year’s yield results are presented in Table 1 (below). The establishment was good except for the Premier Digit grass which was attacked by Crab grass leaf beetle larvae. While Strickland finger grass and Premier digit yields were lower overall, the yields were similar for all of the grasses at the final harvest
Table 1 2015 Dry matter yields
|Grass||DM kg/ha (2015)||Total DM Kg/ha|
|6 May||25 Jun||11 Aug||29 Sep||17 Nov|
|Strickland finger grass||4690||4360||2450*||6030||6770||24370|
Please note that the dry matter yields presented here are at 0% moisture. Hay generally is about 12% moisture, so hay yields would be that much higher. Strickland finger grass yield was decreased by selective grazing by wallabies prior to the 11 August harvest.
The trail continued during 2016 to get a full dry season’s results. Samples from each harvest were submitted for nutrient and quality analysis. The plots were cut and cleared off on 23 February 2016, then fertilised. The irrigation was turned on to water the fertiliser in, and left turned on because of the low rainfall wet season. Results to date for 2016 are presented below. At the clearing cut, the site was dry. Nucal clearly had the best yield, estimated at 5 tonnes/ha of dry matter, with the rest about the same yield of about 3.5 tonnes except for the 2 Digitarias, which were slightly lower.
The three Rhodes grasses lost an estimated 10 to 15 % of plants following this clearing cut. There was no apparent mortality in the other 5 grasses. The 2016 dry matter yields are presented in Table 3
Table 2: 2016 Dry matter yields
|Grass||DM kg/ha (2016)||Total DM Kg/ha|
|6 April||31 May||26 July||13 September||25 October|
|Strickland finger grass||4790||3710||3820||4270||3520||20110|
*Splenda setaria yield on 6 April was reduced because it was set back when the plots were sprayed for broadleaf control with metsulfuron methyl/2,4-D amine.
At the harvest on 13 September, some of the grasses were displaying symptoms of potassium deficiency, so the potassium application for the final period was doubled.
At the final harvest it was noticeable that the plant populations in most of the Rhodes grass plots and in the Gatton panic had declined significantly. This is reflected in the yields from the final harvest. These four grasses would have to be resown as the plant population was too low to provide a hay crop in the future.
The yearly and two year total yields are presented in the Table 3 below.
Table 3 Yearly and Overall Total yields
|Grass||Total DM 2015 Kg/ha||Total DM 2016 Kg/ha||Total DM 2016 Kg/ha|
|Strickland finger grass||24370||20110||44480|
Overall, the yields of all the grasses were satisfactory. The annual yield for 2016 was 5t lower than 2015. This was because the first cut in 2016 was only used as a clearing cut. The trial was not fertilised and managed to produce a hay cut until February. The highest yield was Nucal panic at 58t followed by Reclaimer Rhodes at 54t.
The average dry matter yields for each cool season harvest (cut, 4 in 2015 and 5 in 2016) and the overall mean Crude protein percentage (CP%), Dry Matter Digestibility (DMD) and Metabolisable Energy (ME) are presented in Table 4
Table 4 Mean yields per harvest and mean overall quality factors for cool season harvests
|Grass||2015 Yield per cut kg/ha||2016 Yield per cut kg/ha||2 Year Yield per cut kg/ha||CP%||DMD%||ME MJ/kg DM|
|Strickland finger grass||4160||4020||4080||10.7||56.8||8.2|
The quality figures suggest that Strickland is the best quality grass, followed by Splenda setaria and Gatton panic, with a gap to Nucal, followed by the three Rhodes grasses.
These results have not been analysed yet, so the differences between some of the grasses may not be statistically significant.
Last updated: 27 March 2018